On Fri, 2018-11-30 at 16:37 -0800, Dhinakaran Pandiyan wrote:
On Thu, 2018-11-29 at 18:25 -0800, José Roberto de Souza wrote:
Selective updates have a default granularity requirements as stated by eDP spec
Needs reference to the location in the spec.
Done
, so check if HW can match those requirements before enable PSR2.
typo: enabling*
Done
Cc: Dhinakaran Pandiyan dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com Cc: Rodrigo Vivi rodrigo.vivi@intel.com Signed-off-by: José Roberto de Souza jose.souza@intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c | 12 ++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c index c4a8f476eea9..282ff1bc68a7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_psr.c @@ -539,6 +539,18 @@ static bool intel_psr2_config_valid(struct intel_dp *intel_dp, return false; }
- /* HW will always send full lines in SU blocks, so X will
s/X/starting X coordinate
* always be 0 and we only need to check the width to validate
* horizontal granularity.
* About vertical granularity HW works by SU blocks starting
* at each 4 lines with height of 4 lines, what eDP states
* that sink should support.
How about rewriting this as - "HW sends SU blocks of size four scan lines, which means the starting X coordinate and Y granularity requirements will always be met. We only need to validate the SU block width is a multiple of 4."?
Sounds better, thanks
*/
- if (crtc_hdisplay % 4) {
DRM_DEBUG_KMS("PSR2 not enabled, default SU granularity
not match\n");
"PSR2 not enabled, hdisplay(%d) not multiple of 4\n"
Done.
With nits addressed,
Reviewed-by: Dhinakaran Pandiyan dhinakaran.pandiyan@intel.com
Thanks
return false;
- }
- return true;
}