23 Mar
2022
23 Mar
'22
12:04 p.m.
On Wednesday, March 23rd, 2022 at 13:02, Jani Nikula jani.nikula@intel.com wrote:
Simon and Daniel also tell me on IRC we can't just modify the base block extension count to match HF-EEODB to dodge the problem, because the EDID gets exposed to userspace.
I'm not familiar how the EDID blob gets exposed to user-space. If the EDID data gets copied when creating the blob, and the blob is created before the kernel mutates the EDID to accomodate for HF-EEODB, then this proposal might still be workable.