On 24 May 2016 at 05:23, Dave Airlie airlied@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 May 2016 at 05:20, Dave Airlie airlied@gmail.com wrote:
On 24 May 2016 at 04:59, Linus Torvalds torvalds@linux-foundation.org wrote:
On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 11:41 PM, Dave Airlie airlied@linux.ie wrote:
Here's the main drm pull request for 4.7, it's been a busy one, and I've been a bit more distracted in real life this merge window.
Hmm.
I pulled this, but I think I'll have to unpull again.
Neither the diffstat not the shortlog match what you sent me. There's four extra commits at the top that aren't mentioned:
Dave Airlie (3): drm/edid: move displayid tiled block parsing into separate function. drm/edid: move displayid validation to it's own function. drm/edid: add displayid detailed 1 timings to the modelist. (v1.1)
Tomas Bzatek (1): drm/displayid: Iterate over all DisplayID blocks
was that intentional? What happened? Are those commits meant to be merged, or are they wrong? They _look_ ok, but dammit, according to your message they shouldn't be there.
Okay they are meant to be in there, I just had them on my merge list, remembered I hadn't merged them, but had generated a pull request earlier to edit for you and forgot to regenerate it. I'll follow up with a new pull request if you like just to keep things straight.
The "extern C" warnings were one of the patches Arnd sent, I'll follow up with those today.
FYI: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/87900/
is a link to Arnd's patch.
Dave.