Regards Shashank
On 10/10/2015 4:37 AM, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi Shashank,
On 9 October 2015 at 20:29, Shashank Sharma shashank.sharma@intel.com wrote:
CHV/BSW platform supports two different pipe level gamma correction modes, which are:
- Legacy 8-bit mode
- 10-bit CGM (Color Gamut Mapping) mode
This patch does the following:
- Attaches Gamma property to CRTC
- Adds the core Gamma correction function for CHV/BSW
- Adds Gamma correction macros
Signed-off-by: Shashank Sharma shashank.sharma@intel.com Signed-off-by: Kausal Malladi kausalmalladi@gmail.com
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h | 12 +++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.h | 13 ++++ 3 files changed, 139 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h index 60e6a73..885ac8a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_reg.h @@ -8038,4 +8038,16 @@ enum skl_disp_power_wells { #define GEN9_VEBOX_MOCS_0 0xcb00 /* Video MOCS base register*/ #define GEN9_BLT_MOCS_0 0xcc00 /* Blitter MOCS base register*/
+/* Color Management */ +#define PIPEA_CGM_CONTROL (VLV_DISPLAY_BASE + 0x67A00) +#define PIPEB_CGM_CONTROL (VLV_DISPLAY_BASE + 0x69A00) +#define PIPEC_CGM_CONTROL (VLV_DISPLAY_BASE + 0x6BA00) +#define PIPEA_CGM_GAMMA (VLV_DISPLAY_BASE + 0x67000) +#define PIPEB_CGM_GAMMA (VLV_DISPLAY_BASE + 0x69000) +#define PIPEC_CGM_GAMMA (VLV_DISPLAY_BASE + 0x6B000) +#define _PIPE_CGM_CONTROL(pipe) \
(_PIPE3(pipe, PIPEA_CGM_CONTROL, PIPEB_CGM_CONTROL, PIPEC_CGM_CONTROL))
+#define _PIPE_GAMMA_BASE(pipe) \
(_PIPE3(pipe, PIPEA_CGM_GAMMA, PIPEB_CGM_GAMMA, PIPEC_CGM_GAMMA))
- #endif /* _I915_REG_H_ */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c index e466748..cf381b8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_color_manager.c @@ -27,6 +27,112 @@
#include "intel_color_manager.h"
+static int chv_set_gamma(struct drm_device *dev, struct drm_property_blob *blob,
struct drm_crtc *crtc)
+{
bool flag = false;
enum pipe pipe;
u16 red_fract, green_fract, blue_fract;
u32 red, green, blue, num_samples;
u32 word = 0;
u32 count = 0;
u32 cgm_gamma_reg = 0;
u32 cgm_control_reg = 0;
int ret = 0, length;
struct drm_r32g32b32 *correction_values = NULL;
You can drop the useless initialization of correction_values. Same goes for patches 19 and 21.
Agree, thanks for pointing it out.
struct drm_palette *gamma_data;
struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = dev->dev_private;
if (WARN_ON(!blob))
return -EINVAL;
gamma_data = (struct drm_palette *)blob->data;
pipe = to_intel_crtc(crtc)->pipe;
num_samples = gamma_data->num_samples;
length = num_samples * sizeof(struct drm_r32g32b32);
Calculation can overflow.
good catch, will take care of this.
switch (num_samples) {
case GAMMA_DISABLE_VALS:
/* Disable Gamma functionality on Pipe - CGM Block */
cgm_control_reg = I915_READ(_PIPE_CGM_CONTROL(pipe));
cgm_control_reg &= ~CGM_GAMMA_EN;
I915_WRITE(_PIPE_CGM_CONTROL(pipe), cgm_control_reg);
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("Gamma disabled on Pipe %c\n",
pipe_name(pipe));
Indentation looks wrong here.
Oops, bloody SI :).
ret = 0;
Drop the variable and return 0, at the bottom of the function ?
Let me check this out.
break;
case CHV_8BIT_GAMMA_MAX_VALS:
case CHV_10BIT_GAMMA_MAX_VALS:
count = 0;
cgm_gamma_reg = _PIPE_GAMMA_BASE(pipe);
correction_values = (struct drm_r32g32b32 *)&gamma_data->lut;
while (count < num_samples) {
Using for(i = 0;....) loop seems the more common approach ?
Nah, we are good with while. The whole color management series prefers while (and me too.... :))
[snip]
/*
* On CHV, the best supported Gamma capability is
* CGM block, that takes 257 samples.
* If user gives 256 samples (legacy mode), then
* duplicate the 256th value to 257th.
* "flag" is used to make sure it happens only once
*/
if (num_samples == CHV_8BIT_GAMMA_MAX_VALS &&
count == CHV_8BIT_GAMMA_MAX_VALS && !flag) {
count--;
flag = true;
}
There is little point in going over this if statement 256 odd times. Split it out of the loop ?
Makes sense for sure, let me try this out.
}
/* Enable (CGM) Gamma on Pipe */
I915_WRITE(_PIPE_CGM_CONTROL(pipe),
I915_READ(_PIPE_CGM_CONTROL(pipe)) | CGM_GAMMA_EN);
DRM_DEBUG_DRIVER("CGM Gamma enabled on Pipe %c\n",
pipe_name(pipe));
Indentation.
Guilty.
ret = 0;
Drop the variable ?
Agree
break;
default:
DRM_ERROR("Invalid number of samples for Gamma LUT\n");
ret = -EINVAL;
return -EINVAL;
Agree
}
return ret;
return 0;
Agree
Regards, Emil