While reviewing patches for handling workarounds related to gen9 bc, Imre from Intel discovered that we're using spt_hpd_irq_setup() on ICP+ PCHs despite it being almost the same as icp_hpd_irq_setup(). Since we need to be calling icp_hpd_irq_setup() to ensure that CML-S/TGP platforms function correctly anyway, let's move platforms using PCH_ICP which aren't handled by gen11_hpd_irq_setup() over to icp_hpd_irq_setup().
Cc: Tejas Upadhyay tejaskumarx.surendrakumar.upadhyay@intel.com Signed-off-by: Lyude Paul lyude@redhat.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c index f86b147f588f..7ec61187a315 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_irq.c @@ -4320,6 +4320,8 @@ void intel_irq_init(struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv) dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = gen11_hpd_irq_setup; else if (IS_GEN9_LP(dev_priv)) dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = bxt_hpd_irq_setup; + else if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_ICP) + dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = icp_hpd_irq_setup; else if (INTEL_PCH_TYPE(dev_priv) >= PCH_SPT) dev_priv->display.hpd_irq_setup = spt_hpd_irq_setup; else