Den 21.02.2020 22.02, skrev Daniel Vetter:
drm_mode_config_cleanup is idempotent, so no harm in calling this twice. This allows us to gradually switch drivers over by removing explicit drm_mode_config_cleanup calls.
With this step it's not also possible that (at least for simple drivers) automatic resource cleanup can be done correctly without a drm_driver->release hook. Therefore allow this now in devm_drm_dev_init().
Also with drmm_ explicit drm_driver->release hooks are kinda not the best option, so deprecate that hook to discourage future users.
v2: Fixup the example in the kerneldoc too.
v3:
- For paranoia, double check that minor->dev == dev in the release hook, because I botched the pointer math in the drmm library.
- Call drm_mode_config_cleanup when drmm_add_action fails, we'd be missing some mutex_destroy and ida_cleanup otherwise (Laurent)
v4: Add a drmm_add_action_or_reset (like devm_ has) to encapsulate this pattern (Noralf).
Cc: Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com Cc: "Noralf Trønnes" noralf@tronnes.org Cc: Sam Ravnborg sam@ravnborg.org Cc: Thomas Zimmermann tzimmermann@suse.de Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@intel.com
<snip>
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c index 626656369f0b..6376be01bbc8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_managed.c @@ -134,6 +134,20 @@ int __drmm_add_action(struct drm_device *dev, } EXPORT_SYMBOL(__drmm_add_action);
+int __drmm_add_action_or_reset(struct drm_device *dev,
drmres_release_t action,
void *data, const char *name)
+{
- int ret;
- ret = __drmm_add_action(dev, action, data, name);
- if (ret)
action(dev, data);
- return ret;
+} +EXPORT_SYMBOL(__drmm_add_action_or_reset);
void drmm_remove_action(struct drm_device *dev, drmres_release_t action, void *data) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c index 08e6eff6a179..6f7005bc597f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@ #include <drm/drm_drv.h> #include <drm/drm_encoder.h> #include <drm/drm_file.h> +#include <drm/drm_managed.h> #include <drm/drm_mode_config.h> #include <drm/drm_print.h> #include <linux/dma-resv.h> @@ -373,6 +374,11 @@ static int drm_mode_create_standard_properties(struct drm_device *dev) return 0; }
+static void drm_mode_config_init_release(struct drm_device *dev, void *ptr) +{
- drm_mode_config_cleanup(dev);
+}
/**
- drm_mode_config_init - initialize DRM mode_configuration structure
- @dev: DRM device
@@ -384,8 +390,10 @@ static int drm_mode_create_standard_properties(struct drm_device *dev)
- problem, since this should happen single threaded at init time. It is the
- driver's problem to ensure this guarantee.
- Cleanup is automatically handled through registering drm_mode_config_cleanup
*/
- with drmm_add_action().
-void drm_mode_config_init(struct drm_device *dev) +int drm_mode_config_init(struct drm_device *dev) { mutex_init(&dev->mode_config.mutex); drm_modeset_lock_init(&dev->mode_config.connection_mutex); @@ -443,6 +451,9 @@ void drm_mode_config_init(struct drm_device *dev) drm_modeset_acquire_fini(&modeset_ctx); dma_resv_fini(&resv); }
- return drmm_add_action_or_reset(dev, drm_mode_config_init_release,
NULL);
} EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_config_init);
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_managed.h b/include/drm/drm_managed.h index 2b1ba2ad5582..684f884b6cea 100644 --- a/include/drm/drm_managed.h +++ b/include/drm/drm_managed.h @@ -18,6 +18,13 @@ int __must_check __drmm_add_action(struct drm_device *dev, drmres_release_t action, void *data, const char *name);
+#define drmm_add_action_or_reset(dev, action, data) \
- __drmm_add_action(dev, action, data, #action)
Copy-paste error here, you want __drmm_add_action_or_reset().
Apart from that it looks good:
Acked-by: Noralf Trønnes noralf@tronnes.org
+int __must_check __drmm_add_action_or_reset(struct drm_device *dev,
drmres_release_t action,
void *data, const char *name);
void drmm_remove_action(struct drm_device *dev, drmres_release_t action, void *data);