Quoting Harigovindan P (2020-02-17 00:58:42)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts index 388f50ad4fde..349db8fe78a5 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180-idp.dts @@ -232,6 +233,57 @@ vreg_bob: bob { }; };
+&dsi0 {
status = "okay";
vdda-supply = <&vreg_l3c_1p2>;
panel@0 {
compatible = "visionox,rm69299-1080p-display";
reg = <0>;
vdda-supply = <&vreg_l8c_1p8>;
vdd3p3-supply = <&vreg_l18a_2p8>;
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&disp_pins>;
reset-gpios = <&pm6150l_gpio 3 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
ports {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
port@0 {
reg = <0>;
panel0_in: endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&dsi0_out>;
};
};
};
};
ports {
port@1 {
endpoint {
remote-endpoint = <&panel0_in>;
data-lanes = <0 1 2 3>;
Is this property needed? If it's the default assumption it would be nice to omit it so that we don't have to think about it.
};
};
};
+};
+&dsi_phy {
status = "okay";
+};
+&mdp {
status = "okay";
+};
+&mdss {
status = "okay";
+};
&qspi { status = "okay"; pinctrl-names = "default"; @@ -289,6 +341,17 @@ &usb_1_qmpphy {
/* PINCTRL - additions to nodes defined in sc7180.dtsi */
+&pm6150l_gpio {
disp_pins: disp-pins {
Curious how this works. It looks like PMIC GPIOS are expecting the node to look like:
disp_pins: disp-pins { pinconf { pins = "gpio3"; function = PMIC_GPIO_FUNC_FUNC1; qcom,drive-strength = <PMIC_GPIO_STRENGTH_MED>; power-source = <PM6150_GPIO_VPH>; bias-disable; output-low; };
but this doesn't use the macros or the subnode for pinconf. Why? Also, the PM6150_GPIO_VPH macro doesn't exist.
pins = "gpio3";
function = "func1";
qcom,drive-strength = <2>;
power-source = <0>;
bias-disable;
output-low;
};
+};