On Thu, Nov 05, 2020 at 02:44:15AM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote: [...]
+static void tegra_pwm_deinit_opp_table(void *data) +{
- struct device *dev = data;
- struct opp_table *opp_table;
- opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(dev);
- dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
- dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(opp_table);
- dev_pm_opp_put_opp_table(opp_table);
+}
+static int devm_tegra_pwm_init_opp_table(struct device *dev) +{
- struct opp_table *opp_table;
- const char *rname = "core";
- int err;
- /* voltage scaling is optional */
- if (device_property_present(dev, "core-supply"))
opp_table = dev_pm_opp_set_regulators(dev, &rname, 1);
- else
opp_table = dev_pm_opp_get_opp_table(dev);
- if (IS_ERR(opp_table))
return dev_err_probe(dev, PTR_ERR(opp_table),
"failed to prepare OPP table\n");
- /*
* OPP table presence is optional and we want the set_rate() of OPP
* API to work similarly to clk_set_rate() if table is missing in a
* device-tree. The add_table() errors out if OPP is missing in DT.
*/
- if (device_property_present(dev, "operating-points-v2")) {
err = dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(dev);
if (err) {
dev_err(dev, "failed to add OPP table: %d\n", err);
goto put_table;
}
- }
- err = devm_add_action(dev, tegra_pwm_deinit_opp_table, dev);
- if (err)
goto remove_table;
- return 0;
+remove_table:
- dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(dev);
+put_table:
- dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(opp_table);
- return err;
+}
These two functions seem to be heavily boilerplate across all these drivers. Have you considered splitting these out into separate helpers?
Thierry