On Thu, Jun 17, 2021 at 10:43:34AM -0400, Jonathan Marek wrote:
Document a new phy-type property which will be used to determine whether the phy should operate in D-PHY or C-PHY mode.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Marek jonathan@marek.ca Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com
.../devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml | 5 +++++ include/dt-bindings/phy/phy.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml index c0077ca7e9e7..70809d1cac54 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/msm/dsi-phy-7nm.yaml @@ -34,6 +34,11 @@ properties: description: | Connected to VDD_A_DSI_PLL_0P9 pin (or VDDA_DSI{0,1}_PLL_0P9 for sm8150)
- phy-type:
- description: D-PHY (default) or C-PHY mode
- enum: [ 10, 11 ]
- default: 10
required:
- compatible
- reg
diff --git a/include/dt-bindings/phy/phy.h b/include/dt-bindings/phy/phy.h index 887a31b250a8..f48c9acf251e 100644 --- a/include/dt-bindings/phy/phy.h +++ b/include/dt-bindings/phy/phy.h @@ -20,5 +20,7 @@ #define PHY_TYPE_XPCS 7 #define PHY_TYPE_SGMII 8 #define PHY_TYPE_QSGMII 9 +#define PHY_TYPE_DPHY 10 +#define PHY_TYPE_CPHY 11
I thought I recalled a suggestion to add 'MIPI_' in this. Or was there another similar patch? If not, I'm fine either way:
Acked-by: Rob Herring robh@kernel.org