On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 2:24 PM, Laura Abbott labbott@redhat.com wrote:
There's an ongoing effort to remove VLAs[1] from the kernel to eventually turn on -Wvla. Switch to a constant value that covers all hardware.
[1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2018/3/7/621
Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling Felix.Kuehling@amd.com Acked-by: Christian König christian.koenig@amd.com Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott labbott@redhat.com
Friendly ping -- I don't see this in -next yet. Oded, does this look okay to apply?
Thanks!
-Kees
v3: Introduced a #define for the max value, switched to pr_err_once to avoid log flood, switched to sizeof(array) per private suggestion.
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_interrupt.c | 8 +++++--- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h | 2 ++ 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_interrupt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_interrupt.c index 035c351f47c5..db6d9336b80d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_interrupt.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_interrupt.c @@ -139,10 +139,12 @@ static void interrupt_wq(struct work_struct *work) { struct kfd_dev *dev = container_of(work, struct kfd_dev, interrupt_work);
uint32_t ih_ring_entry[KFD_MAX_RING_ENTRY_SIZE];
uint32_t ih_ring_entry[DIV_ROUND_UP(dev->device_info->ih_ring_entry_size,sizeof(uint32_t))];
if (dev->device_info->ih_ring_entry_size > sizeof(ih_ring_entry)) {dev_err_once(kfd_chardev(), "Ring entry too small\n");return;} while (dequeue_ih_ring_entry(dev, ih_ring_entry)) dev->device_info->event_interrupt_class->interrupt_wq(dev,diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h index 96a9cc0f02c9..a90db05dfe61 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdkfd/kfd_priv.h @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@
#include "amd_shared.h"
+#define KFD_MAX_RING_ENTRY_SIZE 8
#define KFD_SYSFS_FILE_MODE 0444
#define KFD_MMAP_DOORBELL_MASK 0x8000000000000ull
2.14.3