On Thu, Oct 19, 2017 at 10:27:19AM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 19.10.2017, 10:17 +0200 schrieb Thierry Reding:
On Wed, Oct 18, 2017 at 07:22:40PM +0200, Lucas Stach wrote:
Only exposes a single mode and not a complete display timing, as the datasheet is rather vague about the minimum/maximum values.
Signed-off-by: Lucas Stach l.stach@pengutronix.de Acked-by: Rob Herring robh@kernel.org
v2:
- fix display size in documentation
- add bus flags
.../display/panel/toshiba,lt089ac29000.txt | 8 +++++++ drivers/gpu/drm/panel/panel-simple.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 35 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/toshiba,lt089ac29000.txt
Separate patches are preferred for bindings and driver.
This is news to me. At least in simple-panel land, I've always only split out additions of new vendor prefixes and kept the bindings together with the driver.
I'll change that in the future if you prefer otherwise.
I don't mind too much either way, but I've seen Rob say he prefers separate patches. I guess ultimately that makes it easier to move the DT bindings outside of the kernel tree, but maybe there are other reasons, too.
Rob, care to educate us?
Thierry