Hi José
Quoting José Expósito (2022-02-28 18:39:54)
The function "drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge" has been deprecated in favor of "devm_drm_of_get_bridge".
Switch to the new function and reduce boilerplate.
Signed-off-by: José Expósito jose.exposito89@gmail.com
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c | 8 +------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c index dab8f76618f3..fb8e16ed7e90 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-sn65dsi86.c @@ -1232,15 +1232,9 @@ static int ti_sn_bridge_probe(struct auxiliary_device *adev, { struct ti_sn65dsi86 *pdata = dev_get_drvdata(adev->dev.parent); struct device_node *np = pdata->dev->of_node;
struct drm_panel *panel; int ret;ret = drm_of_find_panel_or_bridge(np, 1, 0, &panel, NULL);if (ret)return dev_err_probe(&adev->dev, ret,"could not find any panel node\n");pdata->next_bridge = devm_drm_panel_bridge_add(pdata->dev, panel);
pdata->next_bridge = devm_drm_of_get_bridge(pdata->dev, np, 1, 0);
Yikes, I was about to rely on this panel variable to determine if the device is a panel or a display port connector. (Well, I am relying on it, and patches are hoping to be reposted this week).
Is there expected to be another way to identify if the next connection is a panel or a bridge?
Regards
-- Kieran
if (IS_ERR(pdata->next_bridge)) { DRM_ERROR("failed to create panel bridge\n"); return PTR_ERR(pdata->next_bridge);-- 2.25.1