10 Sep
2015
10 Sep
'15
2:04 p.m.
On Do, 2015-09-10 at 09:39 +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
Hi Gerd,
On 9 September 2015 at 12:42, Gerd Hoffmann kraxel@redhat.com wrote:
Add virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer_nolock function, which does the same as virtio_gpu_queue_ctrl_buffer but does not take the virtqueue lock. The caller must hold the lock instead.
The drm subsystem tends to use *_locked and *_unlocked suffixes. With the latter being less common. Not a big deal but perhaps you can use one of those for virtio ?
_locked looks correct for this case to me (looking at drm_vm_close + drm_vm_close_locked to compare). I'll change it.
cheers, Gerd