In drm_is_current_master_locked, accessing drm_file.master should be protected by either drm_file.master_lookup_lock or drm_device.master_mutex. This was previously awkward to assert with lockdep.
Following patch ("locking/lockdep: Provide lockdep_assert{,_once}() helpers"), this assertion is now convenient. So we add in the assertion and explain this lock design in the kerneldoc.
Signed-off-by: Desmond Cheong Zhi Xi desmondcheongzx@gmail.com Acked-by: Boqun Feng boqun.feng@gmail.com Acked-by: Waiman Long longman@redhat.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c | 6 +++--- include/drm/drm_file.h | 4 ++++ 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c index 9c24b8cc8e36..6f4d7ff23c80 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_auth.c @@ -63,9 +63,9 @@
static bool drm_is_current_master_locked(struct drm_file *fpriv) { - /* Either drm_device.master_mutex or drm_file.master_lookup_lock - * should be held here. - */ + lockdep_assert_once(lockdep_is_held(&fpriv->master_lookup_lock) || + lockdep_is_held(&fpriv->minor->dev->master_mutex)); + return fpriv->is_master && drm_lease_owner(fpriv->master) == fpriv->minor->dev->master; }
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_file.h b/include/drm/drm_file.h index 726cfe0ff5f5..a3acb7ac3550 100644 --- a/include/drm/drm_file.h +++ b/include/drm/drm_file.h @@ -233,6 +233,10 @@ struct drm_file { * this only matches &drm_device.master if the master is the currently * active one. * + * To update @master, both &drm_device.master_mutex and + * @master_lookup_lock need to be held, therefore holding either of + * them is safe and enough for the read side. + * * When dereferencing this pointer, either hold struct * &drm_device.master_mutex for the duration of the pointer's use, or * use drm_file_get_master() if struct &drm_device.master_mutex is not