Hi John,
On Thu, Sep 26, 2019 at 02:36:33PM -0700, John Stultz wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 3:12 PM Brian Starkey Brian.Starkey@arm.com wrote:
I didn't see any response about using the test harness. Did you decide against it?
Hey! Spent a little time looking at this bit and just wanted to reply to this point. So first, apologies, I think I missed the suggestion earlier. That said, now that I've looked a little bit at the test harness, and at least at this point it feels like it makes it harder to reason with than standard c code. Maybe I need to spend a bit more time on it, but I'm a little hesitant to swap over just yet.
I'm not particularly passionate on this point, but are you? Or was this just a recommendation to check it out and consider it?
No particular strong feelings. I was just poking around the kernel docs for testing and the only info there is about the test harness, so wanted to check if you'd seen/considered it.
A quick grep of tools/testing shows that it's obviously not that popular... so if you don't fancy it I won't complain.
Thanks, -Brian
thanks -john