Hi Ricardo,
Thank you for the patch.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:23:56PM +0200, Ricardo Cañuelo wrote:
Make the ports node optional, since there are some DTs that don't define any ports for ti,tfp410.
Signed-off-by: Ricardo Cañuelo ricardo.canuelo@collabora.com
Shouldn't we fix those DTs instead ? What's the point of a TFP410 without ports in DT ?
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,tfp410.yaml | 1 - 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,tfp410.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,tfp410.yaml index 605831c1e836..1c9421eb80fa 100644 --- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,tfp410.yaml +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/bridge/ti,tfp410.yaml @@ -83,7 +83,6 @@ properties:
required:
- compatible
- ports
if: required: