23 May
2022
23 May
'22
10:44 p.m.
On Tue, 24 May 2022 at 01:44, Dmitry Baryshkov dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, 24 May 2022 at 00:38, Marijn Suijten marijn.suijten@somainline.org wrote:
parent_hw pointers are easier to manage and cheaper to use than repeatedly formatting the parent name and subsequently leaving the clk framework to perform lookups based on that name.
Can you please add a followup patch (or a preface one) removing the rest of devm_kzalloc()'ed clock names.
Argh, stupid me, you did that in the next patch. Please ignore this.
Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov dmitry.baryshkov@linaro.org
--
With best wishes
Dmitry