Hi Dmitry,
(CC'ing Heikki as the original author of software nodes support)
Thank you for the patch.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 12:52:10AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Instead of fwnode_get_named_gpiod() that I plan to hide away, let's use the new fwnode_gpiod_get_index() that mimics gpiod_get_index(), bit
s/bit/but/
works with arbitrary firmware node.
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Reviewed-by: Laurent Pinchart laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com
On a side note, as I'm not very familiar with software nodes, I tried to see how they are to be used, and it seems they are completely undocumented :-( Heikki, is this something that could be fixed ?
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c index 61cc2354ef1b..d9c9c9ebad2b 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c @@ -284,8 +284,8 @@ static int tfp410_get_connector_properties(struct tfp410 *dvi) else dvi->connector_type = DRM_MODE_CONNECTOR_DVID;
- dvi->hpd = fwnode_get_named_gpiod(&connector_node->fwnode,
"hpd-gpios", 0, GPIOD_IN, "hpd");
- dvi->hpd = fwnode_gpiod_get_index(&connector_node->fwnode,
if (IS_ERR(dvi->hpd)) { ret = PTR_ERR(dvi->hpd); dvi->hpd = NULL;"hpd", 0, GPIOD_IN, "hpd");