From: Jakob Bornecrantz jakob@vmware.com
Snooping code expects this to be the case.
Signed-off-by: Jakob Bornecrantz jakob@vmware.com Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom thellstrom@vmware.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c | 4 ++++ 1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c index 40c7e61..880e285 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/vmwgfx/vmwgfx_kms.c @@ -105,6 +105,10 @@ int vmw_du_crtc_cursor_set(struct drm_crtc *crtc, struct drm_file *file_priv, struct vmw_dma_buffer *dmabuf = NULL; int ret;
+ /* A lot of the code assumes this */ + if (handle && (width != 64 || height != 64)) + return -EINVAL; + if (handle) { ret = vmw_user_surface_lookup_handle(dev_priv, tfile, handle, &surface);