On Fri, Oct 09, 2020 at 08:05:10AM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
Hi,
On Thu, Oct 8, 2020 at 10:10 AM Akhil P Oommen akhilpo@codeaurora.org wrote:
Add cooling-cells property and the cooling maps for the gpu tzones to support GPU cooling.
Signed-off-by: Akhil P Oommen akhilpo@codeaurora.org
arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi | 29 ++++++++++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi index d46b383..40d6a28 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sc7180.dtsi @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ /*
- SC7180 SoC device tree source
- Copyright (c) 2019, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
*/
- Copyright (c) 2019-20, The Linux Foundation. All rights reserved.
#include <dt-bindings/clock/qcom,dispcc-sc7180.h> @@ -1885,6 +1885,7 @@ iommus = <&adreno_smmu 0>; operating-points-v2 = <&gpu_opp_table>; qcom,gmu = <&gmu>;
#cooling-cells = <2>;
Presumably we should add this to the devicetree bindings, too?
interconnects = <&gem_noc MASTER_GFX3D &mc_virt SLAVE_EBI1>; interconnect-names = "gfx-mem";
@@ -3825,16 +3826,16 @@ };
gpuss0-thermal {
polling-delay-passive = <0>;
polling-delay-passive = <100>;
Why did you make this change? I'm pretty sure that we _don't_ want this since we're using interrupts for the thermal sensor. See commit 22337b91022d ("arm64: dts: qcom: sc7180: Changed polling mode in Thermal-zones node").
I was going to ask the same, this shouldn't be needed.
polling-delay = <0>; thermal-sensors = <&tsens0 13>; trips { gpuss0_alert0: trip-point0 {
temperature = <90000>;
temperature = <95000>; hysteresis = <2000>;
type = "hot";
type = "passive";
Matthias probably knows better, but I wonder if we should be making two passive trip levels like we do with CPU. IIRC this is important if someone wants to be able to use this with IPA.
Yes, please introduce a second trip point and make both of them 'passive'.