On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 2:17 PM, ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com wrote:
From: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Keeping the modes in the same order as we probe them makes it a bit easier to track what's happening.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
I've just added a regression fixer to my -fixes queue which depends upon the old behaviour ... I'll make a note to fix this once stuff is merged together again. For reference the patch this will break in -fixes is:
commit c3456fb3e4712d0448592af3c5d644c9472cd3c1 Author: Daniel Vetter daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch Date: Mon Jun 10 09:47:58 2013 +0200
drm/i915: prefer VBT modes for SVDO-LVDS over EDID
Cheers, Daniel
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c index e7e9242..f072ac6 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c @@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_crtc_cleanup); void drm_mode_probed_add(struct drm_connector *connector, struct drm_display_mode *mode) {
list_add(&mode->head, &connector->probed_modes);
list_add_tail(&mode->head, &connector->probed_modes);} EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_mode_probed_add);
-- 1.8.1.5
dri-devel mailing list dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
-- Daniel Vetter Software Engineer, Intel Corporation +41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch