The compact-pt layout restrictions should only apply to the ppGTT. Also make this play nice on platforms that only have the 64K GTT restriction, and not the compact-pt thing.
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld matthew.auld@intel.com Cc: Thomas Hellström thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com Cc: Nirmoy Das nirmoy.das@linux.intel.com --- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c | 12 +++++++++--- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c index bccc49a8ab5e..8633bec18fa7 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/selftests/i915_gem_gtt.c @@ -1112,10 +1112,16 @@ static int misaligned_case(struct i915_address_space *vm, struct intel_memory_re expected_vma_size = round_up(size, 1 << (ffs(vma->resource->page_sizes_gtt) - 1)); expected_node_size = expected_vma_size;
- if (NEEDS_COMPACT_PT(vm->i915) && i915_gem_object_is_lmem(obj)) { - /* compact-pt should expand lmem node to 2MB */ + if (HAS_64K_PAGES(vm->i915) && i915_gem_object_is_lmem(obj)) { + /* + * The compact-pt should expand lmem node to 2MB for the ppGTT, + * for all other cases we should only expect 64K. + */ expected_vma_size = round_up(size, I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_64K); - expected_node_size = round_up(size, I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_2M); + if (NEEDS_COMPACT_PT(vm->i915) && !i915_is_ggtt(vm)) + expected_node_size = round_up(size, I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_2M); + else + expected_node_size = round_up(size, I915_GTT_PAGE_SIZE_64K); }
if (vma->size != expected_vma_size || vma->node.size != expected_node_size) {