[Dropping dri-devel from CC again, X driver patches aren't really on topic there]
On Sam, 2011-02-26 at 21:04 +0100, Sedat Dilek wrote:
The first take of my patch missed the breakage against pre-1.10 xservers and now I know XNFasprintf() is not a 1:1 replacement for XNFprintf().
What would be the point of replacing an API with one that is identical except for the function name?
The idea for the fix seemed to be so obvious, but as usual "really" test the patch you are sending to any ML.
Indeed. In particular, for a patch that is advertised to fix a warning, the very least one should do is check it doesn't introduce other warnings...
v2 pushed, thanks.