On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 5:09 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch wrote:
On Wed, May 06, 2015 at 04:49:36PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Shobhit Kumar shobhit.kumar@intel.com wrote:
In case we unload and load a driver module again that is registering a lookup table, without this it will result in multiple entries. Provide an option to remove the lookup table on driver unload
v2: Ccing maintainers
Cc: Samuel Ortiz sameo@linux.intel.com Cc: Linus Walleij linus.walleij@linaro.org Cc: Alexandre Courbot gnurou@gmail.com Cc: Thierry Reding thierry.reding@gmail.com Reviewed-by: Alexandre Courbot acourbot@nvidia.com Signed-off-by: Shobhit Kumar shobhit.kumar@intel.com
Reviewed-by: Linus Walleij linus.walleij@linaro.org
I think the gpio/pwm and mfd parts would all need to go in through the same tree. i915 parts are decoupled. I guess I could do a branch with just those patches, tag it and then send a pull request to all 3 subsystems once it's reviewed. Would that be ok?
That's an immutable branch I guess, and yeah I think it's OK. I usually only pull these in if/when there are conflicts in -next.
Yours, Linus Walleij