On 14/12/21 12:10 am, Matthew Auld wrote:
On 01/12/2021 16:39, Arunpravin wrote:
On contiguous allocation, we round up the size to the *next* power of 2, implement a function to free the unused pages after the newly allocate block.
v2(Matthew Auld):
- replace function name 'drm_buddy_free_unused_pages' with drm_buddy_block_trim
- replace input argument name 'actual_size' with 'new_size'
- add more validation checks for input arguments
- add overlaps check to avoid needless searching and splitting
- merged the below patch to see the feature in action
- add free unused pages support to i915 driver
- lock drm_buddy_block_trim() function as it calls mark_free/mark_split are all globally visible
v3:
- remove drm_buddy_block_trim() error handling and print a warn message if it fails
Signed-off-by: Arunpravin Arunpravin.PaneerSelvam@amd.com
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c | 72 ++++++++++++++++++- drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ttm_buddy_manager.c | 10 +++ include/drm/drm_buddy.h | 4 ++ 3 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c index eddc1eeda02e..707efc82216d 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_buddy.c @@ -434,7 +434,8 @@ alloc_from_freelist(struct drm_buddy_mm *mm, static int __alloc_range(struct drm_buddy_mm *mm, struct list_head *dfs, u64 start, u64 size,
struct list_head *blocks)
struct list_head *blocks,
{ struct drm_buddy_block *block; struct drm_buddy_block *buddy;bool trim_path)
@@ -480,8 +481,20 @@ static int __alloc_range(struct drm_buddy_mm *mm,
if (!drm_buddy_block_is_split(block)) { err = split_block(mm, block);
if (unlikely(err))
if (unlikely(err)) {
if (trim_path)
/*
* Here in case of trim, we return and dont goto
* split failure path as it removes from the
* original list and potentially also freeing
* the block. so we could leave as it is,
* worse case we get some internal fragmentation
* and leave the decision to the user
*/
return err;
Hmm, ideally we don't want to leave around blocks where both buddies are free without then also merging them back(not sure if that trips some BUG_ON). Also IIUC, if we hit this failure path, depending on where the split_block() fails we might be allocating something less than new_size? Also if it's the first split_block() that fails then the user just gets an empty list?
Could we perhaps just turn this node into a temporary root node to prevent recursively freeing itself, but still retain the un-splitting/freeing of the other nodes i.e something like:
list_del(&block->link); mark_free(mm, block); mm->avail += ...;
/* Prevent recursively freeing this node */ parent = block->parent; block->parent = NULL;
list_add(&block->tmp_link, &dfs); ret = _alloc_range(mm, &dfs, new_start, new_size, blocks); if (ret) { mem->avail -= ...; mark_allocated(block); list_add(&block->link, blocks); }
block->parent = parent; return ret;
That way we can also drop the special trim_path handling. Thoughts?
That's a nice idea. It will work.
goto err_undo;
}
}
list_add(&block->right->tmp_link, dfs);
@@ -535,8 +548,61 @@ static int __drm_buddy_alloc_range(struct drm_buddy_mm *mm, for (i = 0; i < mm->n_roots; ++i) list_add_tail(&mm->roots[i]->tmp_link, &dfs);
- return __alloc_range(mm, &dfs, start, size, blocks);
- return __alloc_range(mm, &dfs, start, size, blocks, 0);
+}
+/**
- drm_buddy_block_trim - free unused pages
- @mm: DRM buddy manager
- @new_size: original size requested
- @blocks: output list head to add allocated blocks
- For contiguous allocation, we round up the size to the nearest
- power of two value, drivers consume *actual* size, so remaining
- portions are unused and it can be freed.
- Returns:
- 0 on success, error code on failure.
- */
+int drm_buddy_block_trim(struct drm_buddy_mm *mm,
u64 new_size,
struct list_head *blocks)
+{
- struct drm_buddy_block *block;
- u64 new_start;
- LIST_HEAD(dfs);
- if (!list_is_singular(blocks))
return -EINVAL;
- block = list_first_entry(blocks,
struct drm_buddy_block,
link);
- if (!drm_buddy_block_is_allocated(block))
return -EINVAL;
- if (new_size > drm_buddy_block_size(mm, block))
return -EINVAL;
- if (!new_size && !IS_ALIGNED(new_size, mm->chunk_size))
return -EINVAL;
- if (new_size == drm_buddy_block_size(mm, block))
return 0;
- list_del(&block->link);
- new_start = drm_buddy_block_offset(block);
- mark_free(mm, block);
- list_add(&block->tmp_link, &dfs);
- return __alloc_range(mm, &dfs, new_start, new_size, blocks, 1); }
+EXPORT_SYMBOL(drm_buddy_block_trim);
/**
- drm_buddy_alloc - allocate power-of-two blocks
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ttm_buddy_manager.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ttm_buddy_manager.c index 7c58efb60dba..c5831c27fe82 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ttm_buddy_manager.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_ttm_buddy_manager.c @@ -97,6 +97,16 @@ static int i915_ttm_buddy_man_alloc(struct ttm_resource_manager *man, if (unlikely(err)) goto err_free_blocks;
- if (place->flags & TTM_PL_FLAG_CONTIGUOUS) {
mutex_lock(&bman->lock);
err = drm_buddy_block_trim(mm,
(u64)n_pages << PAGE_SHIFT,
&bman_res->blocks);
mutex_unlock(&bman->lock);
pr_warn("drm_buddy_block_trim failed returing %d for ttm_buffer_object(%p)\n",
err, bo);
IIUC this prints a warning even for success? Anyway, I think we can drop the pr_warn, since normal user can't really do much here?
Yes, I will drop pr_warn
- }
- *res = &bman_res->base; return 0;
diff --git a/include/drm/drm_buddy.h b/include/drm/drm_buddy.h index 316ac0d25f08..90906d9dbbf0 100644 --- a/include/drm/drm_buddy.h +++ b/include/drm/drm_buddy.h @@ -146,6 +146,10 @@ int drm_buddy_alloc(struct drm_buddy_mm *mm, struct list_head *blocks, unsigned long flags);
+int drm_buddy_block_trim(struct drm_buddy_mm *mm,
u64 new_size,
struct list_head *blocks);
void drm_buddy_free(struct drm_buddy_mm *mm, struct drm_buddy_block *block);
void drm_buddy_free_list(struct drm_buddy_mm *mm, struct list_head *objects);