On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 09:12:32PM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote:
On Thu, May 04, 2017 at 06:59:23PM +0200, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
From: Markus Elfring elfring@users.sourceforge.net Date: Thu, 4 May 2017 14:15:00 +0200
The script "checkpatch.pl" pointed information out like the following.
WARNING: quoted string split across lines
Thus fix the affected source code place.
Signed-off-by: Markus Elfring elfring@users.sourceforge.net
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c index 6f3119d40c50..dbd52ea89fb4 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c @@ -1529,8 +1529,8 @@ static int gen6_drpc_info(struct seq_file *m)
forcewake_count = READ_ONCE(dev_priv->uncore.fw_domain[FW_DOMAIN_ID_RENDER].wake_count); if (forcewake_count) {
seq_puts(m, "RC information inaccurate because somebody ""holds a forcewake reference \n");
seq_puts(m,"RC information inaccurate because somebody holds a forcewake reference.\n");And now you break the 80col rule. Blind adherence to checkpatch is impossible. -Chris
No. Checkpatch allows you to go over 80 characters to avoid splitting a string.
regards, dan carpenter