Nit: not sure why we use ERR_PTR for int when calling func was also returning an int. Anyway, that was how the original code was, so:
Reviewed-by: Alan Previn alan.previn.teres.alexis@intel.com
On Thu, 2022-05-05 at 22:41 -0700, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
To avoid false positives in error injection cases.
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_rc.c | 5 ++--- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_rc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_rc.c index e00661fb0853..8f8dd05835c5 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_rc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_rc.c @@ -49,7 +49,6 @@ static int guc_action_control_gucrc(struct intel_guc *guc, bool enable) static int __guc_rc_control(struct intel_guc *guc, bool enable) { struct intel_gt *gt = guc_to_gt(guc);
struct drm_device *drm = &guc_to_gt(guc)->i915->drm; int ret;
if (!intel_uc_uses_guc_rc(>->uc))
@@ -60,8 +59,8 @@ static int __guc_rc_control(struct intel_guc *guc, bool enable)
ret = guc_action_control_gucrc(guc, enable); if (ret) {
drm_err(drm, "Failed to %s GuC RC (%pe)\n",str_enable_disable(enable), ERR_PTR(ret));
i915_probe_error(guc_to_gt(guc)->i915, "Failed to %s GuC RC (%pe)\n",str_enable_disable(enable), ERR_PTR(ret));-- 2.35.1