On 2022-04-13 at 04:18:52 +0530, Vinay Belgaumkar wrote:
This will ensure we don't have false positives when we run error injection tests.
Signed-off-by: Vinay Belgaumkar vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c | 42 ++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c index b170238aa15c..639de3c10545 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gt/uc/intel_guc_slpc.c @@ -152,8 +152,8 @@ static int slpc_query_task_state(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
ret = guc_action_slpc_query(guc, offset); if (unlikely(ret))
As commit logs describe, this code patch can hit, when we run error injection test. Do we need unlikely() here? Br, Anshuman Gupta.
drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to query task state (%pe)\n",
ERR_PTR(ret));
i915_probe_error(i915, "Failed to query task state (%pe)\n",
ERR_PTR(ret));
drm_clflush_virt_range(slpc->vaddr, SLPC_PAGE_SIZE_BYTES);
@@ -170,8 +170,8 @@ static int slpc_set_param(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u8 id, u32 value)
ret = guc_action_slpc_set_param(guc, id, value); if (ret)
drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to set param %d to %u (%pe)\n",
id, value, ERR_PTR(ret));
i915_probe_error(i915, "Failed to set param %d to %u (%pe)\n",
id, value, ERR_PTR(ret));
return ret;
} @@ -211,8 +211,8 @@ static int slpc_force_min_freq(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc, u32 freq) SLPC_PARAM_GLOBAL_MIN_GT_UNSLICE_FREQ_MHZ, freq); if (ret)
drm_err(&i915->drm, "Unable to force min freq to %u: %d",
freq, ret);
i915_probe_error(i915, "Unable to force min freq to %u: %d",
freq, ret);
}
return ret;
@@ -247,9 +247,9 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_init(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
err = intel_guc_allocate_and_map_vma(guc, size, &slpc->vma, (void **)&slpc->vaddr); if (unlikely(err)) {
drm_err(&i915->drm,
"Failed to allocate SLPC struct (err=%pe)\n",
ERR_PTR(err));
i915_probe_error(i915,
"Failed to allocate SLPC struct (err=%pe)\n",
return err; }ERR_PTR(err));
@@ -316,15 +316,15 @@ static int slpc_reset(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) ret = guc_action_slpc_reset(guc, offset);
if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
drm_err(&i915->drm, "SLPC reset action failed (%pe)\n",
ERR_PTR(ret));
i915_probe_error(i915, "SLPC reset action failed (%pe)\n",
ERR_PTR(ret));
return ret; }
if (!ret) { if (wait_for(slpc_is_running(slpc), SLPC_RESET_TIMEOUT_MS)) {
drm_err(&i915->drm, "SLPC not enabled! State = %s\n",
slpc_get_state_string(slpc));
i915_probe_error(i915, "SLPC not enabled! State = %s\n",
} }slpc_get_state_string(slpc)); return -EIO;
@@ -616,8 +616,8 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc)
ret = slpc_reset(slpc); if (unlikely(ret < 0)) {
drm_err(&i915->drm, "SLPC Reset event returned (%pe)\n",
ERR_PTR(ret));
i915_probe_error(i915, "SLPC Reset event returned (%pe)\n",
return ret; }ERR_PTR(ret));
@@ -632,24 +632,24 @@ int intel_guc_slpc_enable(struct intel_guc_slpc *slpc) /* Ignore efficient freq and set min to platform min */ ret = slpc_ignore_eff_freq(slpc, true); if (unlikely(ret)) {
drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to set SLPC min to RPn (%pe)\n",
ERR_PTR(ret));
i915_probe_error(i915, "Failed to set SLPC min to RPn (%pe)\n",
ERR_PTR(ret));
return ret; }
/* Set SLPC max limit to RP0 */ ret = slpc_use_fused_rp0(slpc); if (unlikely(ret)) {
drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to set SLPC max to RP0 (%pe)\n",
ERR_PTR(ret));
i915_probe_error(i915, "Failed to set SLPC max to RP0 (%pe)\n",
ERR_PTR(ret));
return ret; }
/* Revert SLPC min/max to softlimits if necessary */ ret = slpc_set_softlimits(slpc); if (unlikely(ret)) {
drm_err(&i915->drm, "Failed to set SLPC softlimits (%pe)\n",
ERR_PTR(ret));
i915_probe_error(i915, "Failed to set SLPC softlimits (%pe)\n",
return ret; }ERR_PTR(ret));
-- 2.35.1