Hi Matthias,
Thanks for the review.
On Fri, 2022-04-22 at 13:37 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
On 16/04/2022 04:07, Nancy.Lin wrote:
MT8195 vdosys1 has more than 32 reset bits and a different reset base than other chips. Modify mmsys for support 64 bit and different reset base.
Signed-off-by: Nancy.Lin nancy.lin@mediatek.com Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno < angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h | 1 + drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++----
drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h | 1 + 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h index 5469073e3073..0a286fa5a824 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mt8195-mmsys.h @@ -139,6 +139,7 @@ #define MT8195_VDO1_MIXER_SOUT_SEL_IN 0xf68 #define MT8195_MIXER_SOUT_SEL_IN_FROM_DISP_MIXER 0
+#define MT8195_VDO1_SW0_RST_B 0x1d0 #define MT8195_VDO1_MERGE0_ASYNC_CFG_WD 0xe30 #define MT8195_VDO1_HDRBE_ASYNC_CFG_WD 0xe70 #define MT8195_VDO1_HDR_TOP_CFG 0xd00 diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c index ea04aa2c3840..d7c806f9e494 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ #include "mt8195-mmsys.h" #include "mt8365-mmsys.h"
+#define MMSYS_SW_RESET_PER_REG 32
- static const struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data
mt2701_mmsys_driver_data = { .clk_driver = "clk-mt2701-mm", .routes = mmsys_default_routing_table, @@ -86,6 +88,7 @@ static const struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data mt8173_mmsys_driver_data = { .routes = mmsys_default_routing_table, .num_routes = ARRAY_SIZE(mmsys_default_routing_table), .sw0_rst_offset = MT8183_MMSYS_SW0_RST_B,
.num_resets = 32, };
static const struct mtk_mmsys_match_data mt8173_mmsys_match_data
= { @@ -100,6 +103,7 @@ static const struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data mt8183_mmsys_driver_data = { .routes = mmsys_mt8183_routing_table, .num_routes = ARRAY_SIZE(mmsys_mt8183_routing_table), .sw0_rst_offset = MT8183_MMSYS_SW0_RST_B,
.num_resets = 32, };
static const struct mtk_mmsys_match_data mt8183_mmsys_match_data
= { @@ -114,6 +118,7 @@ static const struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data mt8186_mmsys_driver_data = { .routes = mmsys_mt8186_routing_table, .num_routes = ARRAY_SIZE(mmsys_mt8186_routing_table), .sw0_rst_offset = MT8186_MMSYS_SW0_RST_B,
.num_resets = 32, };
static const struct mtk_mmsys_match_data mt8186_mmsys_match_data
= { @@ -148,6 +153,8 @@ static const struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data mt8195_vdosys1_driver_data = { .clk_driver = "clk-mt8195-vdo1", .routes = mmsys_mt8195_routing_table, .num_routes = ARRAY_SIZE(mmsys_mt8195_routing_table),
.sw0_rst_offset = MT8195_VDO1_SW0_RST_B,
.num_resets = 64, };
static const struct mtk_mmsys_match_data mt8195_mmsys_match_data
= { @@ -234,18 +241,22 @@ static int mtk_mmsys_reset_update(struct reset_controller_dev *rcdev, unsigned l { struct mtk_mmsys *mmsys = container_of(rcdev, struct mtk_mmsys, rcdev); unsigned long flags;
u32 offset; u32 reg;
offset = (id / MMSYS_SW_RESET_PER_REG) * sizeof(u32);
id = id % MMSYS_SW_RESET_PER_REG;
spin_lock_irqsave(&mmsys->lock, flags);
- reg = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs + mmsys->data->sw0_rst_offset);
- reg = readl_relaxed(mmsys->regs + mmsys->data->sw0_rst_offset +
offset);
if (assert) reg &= ~BIT(id); else reg |= BIT(id);
- writel_relaxed(reg, mmsys->regs + mmsys->data->sw0_rst_offset);
- writel_relaxed(reg, mmsys->regs + mmsys->data->sw0_rst_offset +
offset);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mmsys->lock, flags);
@@ -360,18 +371,6 @@ static int mtk_mmsys_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) return ret; }
- spin_lock_init(&mmsys->lock);
- mmsys->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
- mmsys->rcdev.nr_resets = 32;
- mmsys->rcdev.ops = &mtk_mmsys_reset_ops;
- mmsys->rcdev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
- ret = devm_reset_controller_register(&pdev->dev, &mmsys-
rcdev);
- if (ret) {
dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't register mmsys reset
controller: %d\n", ret);
return ret;
- }
I'm not sure why you move that code block. It's not explained in the commit message.
Regards, Matthias
The reason for moving the code block is the need for getting mmsys-
data first and then getting the nr_resets from mmsys->data- num_resets. So I move the whole reset code section behind the get
mmsys->data code section. I will explain more detail in the commit message.
Regards, Nancy