Marek Szyprowski wrote:
Hello,
Hi all,
[...]
static struct s3c_fb_driverdata s3c_fb_data_exynos5 = { .variant = { .nr_windows = 5,
.vidtcon = VIDTCON0,
.vidtcon = FIMD_V8_VIDTCON0,
Yes, this method looks good imo. Maybe even having something like vidtcon_base in variant structure will be enough to cover all VIDTCON0-3 registers.
Yes, I agree. And how about changing the name of s3c_fb_drvierdata to xxx_fimd_v8 not xxx_fimd_exynos5? It's time to use independent from SoC name because we don't have any guarantee of same address on all of EXYNOS5 SoCs.
Thanks.
Best regards, Kgene. -- Kukjin Kim kgene.kim@samsung.com, Senior Engineer, SW Solution Development Team, Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.