On Sat, Dec 5, 2015 at 5:42 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux linux@arm.linux.org.uk wrote:
On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 12:26:19PM +0100, Lucas Stach wrote:
I see where you are going here and I appreciate that this discussion isn't a exercise in bikeshed, but based on technical facts.
It would be nice (for the sake of this discussion not getting heated) if Rob could show that he's been reading my replies to his questions. My impression so far is that I'm being ignored. Evidence being Rob's assertion that his points have not been addressed, where I've replied with the technical responses - and not one of those has seen any kind of reply.
Sorry, I had missed your reply before I did reply.
In any case, I'm satisfied with the reasoning and the virtual node is fine. I do want to see a note in the binding doc about why the compatible string is not specific.
Rob