Russell King - ARM Linux linux@armlinux.org.uk writes:
On Mon, Mar 20, 2017 at 04:36:14PM -0700, Eric Anholt wrote:
+static struct amba_driver pl111_amba_driver = {
- .drv = {
.name = "clcd-pl11x",
either:
.name = "clcd-pl111",
or:
.name = "drm-clcd-pl111",
otherwise the driver names will clash in sysfs - driver names must be unique.
- },
- .probe = pl111_amba_probe,
- .remove = pl111_amba_remove,
- .id_table = pl111_id_table,
+}; +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM_AMBA */
+module_amba_driver(pl111_amba_driver);
+MODULE_DESCRIPTION(DRIVER_DESC); +MODULE_AUTHOR("ARM Ltd."); +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL"); +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:pl111_drm");
Does the platform alias make sense for an OF-only driver?
Not sure, this is left over from the original submission.
If I renamed to drm-clcd-pl111 and dropped the alias, would that get your ack?