On 10/29/21 14:21, Matthew Auld wrote:
We were overzealous here; even though discrete is non-LLC, it should still be always coherent.
v2(Thomas & Daniel)
- Be extra cautious and limit to DG1
- Add some more commentary
Signed-off-by: Matthew Auld matthew.auld@intel.com Cc: Thomas Hellström thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com Cc: Daniel Vetter daniel@ffwll.ch
Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellström thomas.hellstrom@linux.intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c | 15 +++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c index a45d0ec2c5b6..a2b485a1be8c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/gem/i915_gem_dmabuf.c @@ -250,8 +250,19 @@ static int i915_gem_object_get_pages_dmabuf(struct drm_i915_gem_object *obj) if (IS_ERR(pages)) return PTR_ERR(pages);
- /* XXX: consider doing a vmap flush or something */
- if (!HAS_LLC(i915) || i915_gem_object_can_bypass_llc(obj))
/*
* DG1 is special here since it still snoops transactions even with* CACHE_NONE. This is not the case with other HAS_SNOOP platforms. We* might need to revisit this as we add new discrete platforms.** XXX: Consider doing a vmap flush or something, where possible.* Currently we just do a heavy handed wbinvd_on_all_cpus() here since* the underlying sg_table might not even point to struct pages, so we* can't just call drm_clflush_sg or similar, like we do elsewhere in* the driver.*/if (i915_gem_object_can_bypass_llc(obj) ||
(!HAS_LLC(i915) && !IS_DG1(i915)))wbinvd_on_all_cpus();
sg_page_sizes = i915_sg_dma_sizes(pages->sgl);