Hi Jonathan,
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 4:25 PM Jonathan Marek jonathan@marek.ca wrote:
Hi,
I tried this and it works with patches 4+5 from Rob's series and changing gpummu to use sg_phys(sg) instead of sg->dma_address (dma_address isn't set now that dma_map_sg isn't used).
Thanks for testing it. I haven't had a chance to test it yet.
Rob,
I assume your series is targeted to 5.4, correct?
If this is the case, what we should do about the i.MX5 regression on 5.3?
Would a revert of the two commits be acceptable in 5.3 in order to avoid the regression?
Please advise.
Thanks