In general, I'll pick up any patches that are good,
This is usual.
but the current track record is that Markus' patches need extra scrutiny,
I find that this can be fine according to a safe review for presented update suggestions.
and many of the patches contain subjective changes that lead to debate
Some discussion is occasionally needed to achieve the desired change acceptance, isn't it?
that is not constructive.
I got an other opinion here.
There's no return on investment here.
I hope that the view can become more positive. How will the clarification evolve further?
Regards, Markus