On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 11:04:10PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 04:08:39PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
Op 22-03-16 om 15:58 schreef Ville Syrjälä:
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:42:14PM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote:
__drm_atomic_helper_plane_destroy_state calls drm_framebuffer_unreference, which means that if drm_framebuffer_free is called before plane->destroy freed memory will be accessed.
A similar case happens for the blob list, which was freed before the crtc state was, resulting in the unreference_blob from crtc_destroy_state pointing to garbage memory causing another opportunity for a GPF.
Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 18 +++++++++--------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c index 51c5a00ffdff..5a13b1afccbe 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c @@ -5958,6 +5958,15 @@ void drm_mode_config_cleanup(struct drm_device *dev) drm_property_destroy(dev, property); }
And what about props? Any chance of explosion due to those being gone?
Not as far as I'm aware of.
If you use something like a crtc_x property, only the value gets written to crtc_state, the value is an int that would still be valid.
I was too lazy to confirm this for all drivers. But at least i915 looked clean on that front. So
Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
Applied to drm-misc, thanks. -Daniel