Hi Chanwoo,
On 08.03.2018 02:52, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Hi Andrzej, Archit,
On 2018년 03월 07일 20:13, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
Hi Chanwoo, Archit,
On 07.03.2018 05:48, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
On 2018년 03월 07일 11:12, Chanwoo Choi wrote:
Hi Rob and Andrzej,
On 2018년 03월 06일 21:53, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
Hi Rob, Chanwoo, Krzysztof,
On 27.02.2018 08:11, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
Hi,
Thanks for reviews of previous iterations.
This patchset introduces USB physical connector bindings, together with working example. I have removed RFC prefix - the patchset seems to be heading to a happy end :)
v5: fixed extra parenthesis in dts, renamed extcon function. v4: improved binding descriptions, added missing reg in dts. v3: Separate binding for Samsung 11-pin connector, added full-blown USB-C example. v2: I have addressed comments by Rob and Laurent, thanks
Changes in datail are described in the patches.
Regards Andrzej
Andrzej Hajda (5): dt-bindings: add bindings for USB physical connector dt-bindings: add bindings for Samsung micro-USB 11-pin connector arm64: dts: exynos: add micro-USB connector node to TM2 platforms arm64: dts: exynos: add OF graph between MHL and USB connector extcon: add possibility to get extcon device by OF node
Maciej Purski (1): drm/bridge/sii8620: use micro-USB cable detection logic to detect MHL
It looks like all patches received R-B or acks (I forgot add Krzysztof's acks for dts part). Now I have a question how to merge them. The only functional dependency is between bridge and extcon, and from the formal PoV bindings should be merged 1st. I can merge it:
- All patches via drm-misc tree.
- All patches except dts via drm-misc, and Krzysztof will merge dts via
samsung-soc tree.
Is it OK, for all? Better ideas?
Krzysztof picked the dts patches. I'll make the immutable branch based on v4.16-rc1 and apply them except for dts patchs. And I'll send the immutable branch to Rob and Andrzej.
I made the immutable branch[1] as following: If you agree, I'll send pull request. [1] https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/chanwoo/extcon.git/log/?h=ib...
Or you can make the immutable branch and send pull request to Rob and me.
It seems you took v5 instead of v6 version of extcon patch.
My mistake. I picked v6 and made the new immutable branch. After Archit confirm it, I'll send pull request.
Lets just queue all patches (except dts) via extcon branch (thanks Daniel for advice), without making immutable branch. It seems to be a simplest acceptable approach.
You can add my ack to sii8620 bridge patch (as bridge maintainer), to fulfill process requirements.
Regards Andrzej