Am 18.02.22 um 19:53 schrieb Souptick Joarder:
From: "Souptick Joarder (HPE)" jrdr.linux@gmail.com
Kernel test robot reported warning -> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c:2129:2: warning: Undefined or garbage value returned to caller [clang-analyzer-core. uninitialized.UndefReturn]
Good catch, but that fix is usually seen as bad practice.
The warning is a false positive because the code path which would lead to returning an undefined value can never happen. There is just no way the compiler could know that.
I suggest to better initialize the return value directly before the error handling to indicate that when we have reached this point we can return success safely.
Regards, Christian.
Initialize r inside amdgpu_fill_buffer().
Reported-by: kernel test robot lkp@intel.com Signed-off-by: Souptick Joarder (HPE) jrdr.linux@gmail.com
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c index 414a22dddc78..5fafb223177f 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_ttm.c @@ -2089,7 +2089,7 @@ int amdgpu_fill_buffer(struct amdgpu_bo *bo, struct amdgpu_ring *ring = adev->mman.buffer_funcs_ring; struct dma_fence *fence = NULL; struct amdgpu_res_cursor dst;
- int r;
int r = 0;
if (!adev->mman.buffer_funcs_enabled) { DRM_ERROR("Trying to clear memory with ring turned off.\n");