Looks good for me, patch is: Reviewed-by: Qiang Yu yuq825@gmail.com
Regards, Qiang
On Thu, Aug 20, 2020 at 6:44 PM Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org wrote:
dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table() doesn't report any errors when it fails to find the OPP table with error -ENODEV (i.e. OPP table not present for the device). And we can call dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table() unconditionally here.
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar viresh.kumar@linaro.org
drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c | 6 +----- drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.h | 1 - 2 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c index bbe02817721b..cd290d866a04 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.c @@ -105,10 +105,7 @@ void lima_devfreq_fini(struct lima_device *ldev) devfreq->devfreq = NULL; }
if (devfreq->opp_of_table_added) {dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(ldev->dev);devfreq->opp_of_table_added = false;}
dev_pm_opp_of_remove_table(ldev->dev); if (devfreq->regulators_opp_table) { dev_pm_opp_put_regulators(devfreq->regulators_opp_table);@@ -162,7 +159,6 @@ int lima_devfreq_init(struct lima_device *ldev) ret = dev_pm_opp_of_add_table(dev); if (ret) goto err_fini;
ldevfreq->opp_of_table_added = true; lima_devfreq_reset(ldevfreq);diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.h index 5eed2975a375..2d9b3008ce77 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.h +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/lima/lima_devfreq.h @@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ struct lima_devfreq { struct opp_table *clkname_opp_table; struct opp_table *regulators_opp_table; struct thermal_cooling_device *cooling;
bool opp_of_table_added; ktime_t busy_time; ktime_t idle_time;-- 2.25.0.rc1.19.g042ed3e048af