On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 04:59:29PM -0300, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 09:46:47AM +0300, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
@@ -296,11 +223,17 @@ static struct ib_umem *__ib_umem_get(struct ib_device *device, goto umem_release;
cur_base += ret * PAGE_SIZE;
npages -= ret;
sg = ib_umem_add_sg_table(sg, page_list, ret,
dma_get_max_seg_size(device->dma_device),
&umem->sg_nents);
npages -= ret;
sg = __sg_alloc_table_from_pages(
&umem->sg_head, page_list, ret, 0, ret << PAGE_SHIFT,
dma_get_max_seg_size(device->dma_device), sg, npages,
GFP_KERNEL);
umem->sg_nents = umem->sg_head.nents;
if (IS_ERR(sg)) {
unpin_user_pages_dirty_lock(page_list, ret, 0);
ret = PTR_ERR(sg);
goto umem_release;
}
}
sg_mark_end(sg);
Does it still need the sg_mark_end?
It is preserved here for correctness, the release logic doesn't rely on this marker, but it is better to leave it.
Thanks
Jason