On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja architt@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 12/07/2015 02:40 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja architt@codeaurora.org wrote:
On 12/07/2015 02:15 PM, Jani Nikula wrote:
On Mon, 07 Dec 2015, Archit Taneja architt@codeaurora.org wrote:
Any suggestions on how to fix this? Is it ok to make DRM_MIPI_DSI depend on CONFIG_OF?
Please don't.
Just curious, how did x86 use DSI if the only way to create DSI devices until now was via DT?
Oh, you want the gory details... we use the DSI code as a library for abstraction and helpers, without actually creating or registering the devices.
Okay, got it. I'll go with the IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF) approach.
Thanks, appreciated, so i915 doesn't need to depend on OF.
Humble request: Next time if I share something that doesn't make sense, please reply with something more than a "Please don't". That just sounds condescending and doesn't really help me with my cause either.
That's a fair request, no need to be humble about it. Apologies.
BR, Jani.