On 02.05.2012 18:01, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2012 at 9:11 AM, Christian Königdeathsimple@vodafone.de wrote:
Hi Dave,
there still seems to be the need for some further discussion about the SA code, so I again split that out of the patchset and tested the result a bit.
Most of the stuff still works fine without those offending changes, so to avoid mailing around unrelated and already reviewed patches, I request the include the following 17 patches into drm-next.
If you prefer to merge they are also available from git://people.freedesktop.org/~deathsimple/linux branch reset-rework.
Cheers, Christian.
I am ok with this 17 patchset, i just sent 3 patch on top of those 17 that bring back some other of the previous cleanup.
At least for now those three are NAK, cause I just realized we need to put those on top of a more sophisticated fence implementation.
Your idea of not using a list, but 64 bit sequences instead actually sounds quite nifty to me. Going to hack something together in the next couple of hours.
Christian.