On Thu, Jun 9, 2016 at 4:29 PM, Alexey Brodkin Alexey.Brodkin@synopsys.com wrote:
Hi Daniel,
On Thu, 2016-06-09 at 15:52 +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
The fake implementation is fundamentally racy, and I don't want to write helpers which can't be used correctly. Anyway I think without this patch (or something similar) arcpgu will stall badly with the new nonblocking helpers, because arcpgu didn't bother at all to implement nonblocking. Can you pls ack this, or even better, test the entire patch series? The helpers themselves should work, but in all 5 drivers tested thus far they discovered some bugs.
Sure I will happily test this series. The only question then is what should I use as a proper base?
It should apply on drm-next from Dave. -Daniel