On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 12:47:20PM -0200, Gustavo Padovan wrote:
Hi,
2016-01-25 Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com:
Hey,
Op 21-01-16 om 13:49 schreef Gustavo Padovan:
From: Gustavo Padovan gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk
Hi,
The following patches are some clean ups on the sync framework before we start the actual de-staging. The main changes here are the move of SW_SYNC_USER to debugfs. Removal of struct sync_pt in favor of direct use of struct fence. And the rename of sync_fence to sync_file, a name to better reflect what it is for, a struct that connects struct fence(s) to a file.
Please review. Thanks.
Gustavo Padovan (11): staging/android: fix sync framework documentation staging/android: sync: remove interfaces that are not used staging/android: remove not used sync_timeline ops staging/android: create a 'sync' dir for debugfs information staging/android: move SW_SYNC_USER to a debugfs file staging/android: rename sync_fence to sync_file staging/android: rename 'sync_pt' to 'fence' in struct sync_fence_cb staging/android: remove struct sync_pt staging/android: remove unused var from sync_timeline_signal() staging/android: remove pointless sync_timeline_signal at destroy phase staging/android: remove sync_fence_create_dma()
For whole series: Reviewed-by: Maarten Lankhorst maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com
Renaming sync_fence to sync_file makes sense, it should hopefully reduce confusion.
Poke. What is missing for this to go upstream? Do I need more review here? Thanks.
You just sent this, give me a chance to get to it, my staging patch queue is over 1000 patches at the moment :(
greg k-h