26 Mar
2015
26 Mar
'15
4:56 p.m.
Was honestly hoping that patch #1 is not required as:
- Getting the drm.h header in sync with the kernel will be annoying.
Indeed.
I have a version of drm.h that works with Solaris and *should* still work with all other consumers, but as I still have a ways to get fully to speed, am hesitant to suggest a patch (are there other issues I have yet to discover).
- The struct drm_map/drmMapBufs/drmRmMap is part of the legacy drm
cruft for which, I would like to think, there are no more users.
Obviously the latter can be confirmed by Randy and friends.
I'm somewhat confused by this statement, as I still see the use of struct drm_map, as is it's usage in the Solaris ports of drm. Am I missing something (like I said, I still have a ways to go to get to any decent level of contribution)?
Cheers!
---- Randy