On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 05:35:17PM +0900, Gioh Kim wrote:
From: Gioh Kim gurugio@hanmail.net
Add framework to register callback functions and check page mobility. There are some modes for page isolation so that isolate interface has arguments of page address and isolation mode while putback interface has only page address as argument.
Signed-off-by: Gioh Kim gioh.kim@lge.com Acked-by: Rafael Aquini aquini@redhat.com
fs/proc/page.c | 3 ++ include/linux/compaction.h | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ include/linux/fs.h | 2 + include/linux/page-flags.h | 19 ++++++++ include/uapi/linux/kernel-page-flags.h | 1 + 5 files changed, 105 insertions(+)
An update to the address_space operations in Documentation/filesystems/Locking and Documentation/filesystems/vfs.txt is required. I was going to say "recommended" but it really is required. The responsibilities and locking rules of these interfaces must be extremely clear as you may be asking multiple driver authors to use this interface.
For example, it must be clear to users of these interfaces that the isolate must prevent any parallel updates to the data, prevent parallel frees and halt attempted accesses until migration is complete. It will not always be obvious how to do this and may not be obvious that it is required if someone has not experienced the joy that is mm/migrate.c. For example, mapped LRU pages get unmapped with migration entries so faults that access the data wait until the migration completes. Balloons, zram, graphics will need to provide similar guarantees.
As data accesses may now sleep due to migration, drivers will need to be careful that it is safe to sleep and suggest that they do not attempt to spin.
Depending on how it is implemented, the putback may be responsible for waking up any tasks waiting to access the page.
There are going to be more hazards here which is why documentation to spell it out is ideal and that zram gets converted to find all the locking and access pitfalls.
diff --git a/fs/proc/page.c b/fs/proc/page.c index 7eee2d8..a4f5a00 100644 --- a/fs/proc/page.c +++ b/fs/proc/page.c @@ -146,6 +146,9 @@ u64 stable_page_flags(struct page *page) if (PageBalloon(page)) u |= 1 << KPF_BALLOON;
if (PageMobile(page))
u |= 1 << KPF_MOBILE;u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_LOCKED, PG_locked);
u |= kpf_copy_bit(k, KPF_SLAB, PG_slab);
diff --git a/include/linux/compaction.h b/include/linux/compaction.h index aa8f61c..f693072 100644 --- a/include/linux/compaction.h +++ b/include/linux/compaction.h @@ -1,6 +1,9 @@ #ifndef _LINUX_COMPACTION_H #define _LINUX_COMPACTION_H
+#include <linux/page-flags.h> +#include <linux/pagemap.h>
/* Return values for compact_zone() and try_to_compact_pages() */ /* compaction didn't start as it was deferred due to past failures */ #define COMPACT_DEFERRED 0 @@ -51,6 +54,70 @@ extern void compaction_defer_reset(struct zone *zone, int order, bool alloc_success); extern bool compaction_restarting(struct zone *zone, int order);
+static inline bool mobile_page(struct page *page) +{
- return page->mapping && (PageMobile(page) || PageBalloon(page));
+}
This creates an oddity because now there is a disconnect between movable and mobile pages. They are similar but different.
o A Mobile page is a driver-owned page that has the address space operations that enable migration.
o A Movable page is generally a page mapped by page tables that can be migrated using the existing mechanisms.
The concepts should be unified.
A Mobile page is a driver-owner page that has the address space operations that enable migration. Pages that are mapped by userspace are considered to be mobile with the following properties
a_ops->isolatepage isolates the page from the LRU to prevent parallel reclaim. It is unmapped from page tables using rmap with PTEs replaced by migration entries. Any attempt to access the page will wait in page fault until the migration completes.
a_ops->putbackpage removes the migration entries and wakes up all waiters in page fault.
A further property is that allocation of this type specified __GFP_MOVABLE to group them all together. They are the most mobile page category that are cheapest to move. In theory, all mobile pages could be allocated __GFP_MOVABLE if it's known in advance the page->mapping will have the necessary operations in the future.
?
A complicating factor is that a Movable page as it's currently defined may not have a page->mapping. You'd have to continue replying on PageLRU to identify them as a special page that has access to the necessary isolateppage and putbackpage helpers. However, at least we would have a single view on what a movable page is.
Additional note: After I wrote the above, I read the other reviews. I did not read them in advance so I'd have a fresh view. I see Konstantin Khlebnikov has been active and he suggested the mobility naming to distinguish between the LRU pages. I simply disagree even though I see his reasoning. I do not think we should have a special case of LRU pages and everything else. Instead we should have a single concept of movability (or mobility) with the special case being that LRU pages without an aops can directly call the necessary helpers.
+static inline bool isolate_mobilepage(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode) +{
- bool ret = false;
- /*
* Avoid burning cycles with pages that are yet under __free_pages(),* or just got freed under us.** In case we 'win' a race for a mobile page being freed under us and* raise its refcount preventing __free_pages() from doing its job* the put_page() at the end of this block will take care of* release this page, thus avoiding a nasty leakage.*/- if (unlikely(!get_page_unless_zero(page)))
goto out;
Ok.
- /*
* As mobile pages are not isolated from LRU lists, concurrent* compaction threads can race against page migration functions* as well as race against the releasing a page.** In order to avoid having an already isolated mobile page* being (wrongly) re-isolated while it is under migration,* or to avoid attempting to isolate pages being released,* lets be sure we have the page lock* before proceeding with the mobile page isolation steps.*/- if (unlikely(!trylock_page(page)))
goto out_putpage;
There are some big assumptions here. It assumes that any users of this interface can prevent parallel compaction attempts via the page lock. It also assumes that the caller does not recursively hold the page lock already. It would be incompatible with how LRU pages are isolated as they co-ordinate via the zone->lru_lock.
I suspect you went with the page lock because it happens to be what the balloon driver needed which is fine, but potentially pastes us into a corner later.
I don't see a way this could be generically handled for arbitrary subsystems unless you put responsibility for the locking inside a_ops->isolatepage. That still works for existing movable pages if you give it a pseudo a_ops for pages without page->mapping.
Because of this, I really think it would benefit if there was a patch 3 that converted the existing migration of LRU pages to use the aops interface. This could be done via a fake address_space that only populates the migration interfaces and is used for LRU pages. Then remove the LRU special casing in compaction and migration before converting the balloon driver and zram. This will rattle out any conceivable locking hazard and unify migration in general. I recognise that it's a lot of heavy lifting unfortunately but it leaves you with a partial solution to your problem (zram in the way) and paves the way for drivers to reliably convert.
- if (!(mobile_page(page) && page->mapping->a_ops->isolatepage))
goto out_not_isolated;- ret = page->mapping->a_ops->isolatepage(page, mode);
- if (!ret)
goto out_not_isolated;- unlock_page(page);
- return ret;
+out_not_isolated:
- unlock_page(page);
+out_putpage:
- put_page(page);
+out:
- return ret;
+}
+static inline void putback_mobilepage(struct page *page) +{
- /*
* 'lock_page()' stabilizes the page and prevents races against* concurrent isolation threads attempting to re-isolate it.*/- lock_page(page);
- if (page->mapping && page->mapping->a_ops->putbackpage)
page->mapping->a_ops->putbackpage(page);- unlock_page(page);
- /* drop the extra ref count taken for mobile page isolation */
- put_page(page);
+}
Similar comments about the locking, I think the a_ops handler needs to be responsible. We should not expand the role of the page->lock in the general case.
#else static inline unsigned long try_to_compact_pages(gfp_t gfp_mask, unsigned int order, int alloc_flags, @@ -83,6 +150,19 @@ static inline bool compaction_deferred(struct zone *zone, int order) return true; }
+static inline bool mobile_page(struct page *page) +{
- return false;
+}
+static inline bool isolate_mobilepage(struct page *page, isolate_mode_t mode) +{
- return false;
+}
+static inline void putback_mobilepage(struct page *page) +{ +} #endif /* CONFIG_COMPACTION */
#if defined(CONFIG_COMPACTION) && defined(CONFIG_SYSFS) && defined(CONFIG_NUMA) diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h index a0653e5..2cc4b24 100644 --- a/include/linux/fs.h +++ b/include/linux/fs.h @@ -396,6 +396,8 @@ struct address_space_operations { */ int (*migratepage) (struct address_space *, struct page *, struct page *, enum migrate_mode);
- bool (*isolatepage) (struct page *, isolate_mode_t);
- void (*putbackpage) (struct page *); int (*launder_page) (struct page *); int (*is_partially_uptodate) (struct page *, unsigned long, unsigned long);
diff --git a/include/linux/page-flags.h b/include/linux/page-flags.h index f34e040..abef145 100644 --- a/include/linux/page-flags.h +++ b/include/linux/page-flags.h @@ -582,6 +582,25 @@ static inline void __ClearPageBalloon(struct page *page) atomic_set(&page->_mapcount, -1); }
+#define PAGE_MOBILE_MAPCOUNT_VALUE (-255)
+static inline int PageMobile(struct page *page) +{
- return atomic_read(&page->_mapcount) == PAGE_MOBILE_MAPCOUNT_VALUE;
+}
+static inline void __SetPageMobile(struct page *page) +{
- VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(atomic_read(&page->_mapcount) != -1, page);
- atomic_set(&page->_mapcount, PAGE_MOBILE_MAPCOUNT_VALUE);
+}
+static inline void __ClearPageMobile(struct page *page) +{
- VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(!PageMobile(page), page);
- atomic_set(&page->_mapcount, -1);
+}
This definition of Mobility would prevent LRU pages ever being considered "mobile" in the same why. Why do we not either check it's an LRU page (in which case it's inherently mobile) or has an aops with the correct handlers?
/*
- If network-based swap is enabled, sl*b must keep track of whether pages
- were allocated from pfmemalloc reserves.
diff --git a/include/uapi/linux/kernel-page-flags.h b/include/uapi/linux/kernel-page-flags.h index a6c4962..d50d9e8 100644 --- a/include/uapi/linux/kernel-page-flags.h +++ b/include/uapi/linux/kernel-page-flags.h @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@ #define KPF_THP 22 #define KPF_BALLOON 23 #define KPF_ZERO_PAGE 24 +#define KPF_MOBILE 25
#endif /* _UAPILINUX_KERNEL_PAGE_FLAGS_H */