Additional improvement possibilities can be taken into account after corresponding software development discussions, can't they?
Sure, but that is in contrary to all you replies.
Where do you see a contradiction in this case?
I guess you are familiar with Documentation/process/submitting-patches.rst chapter 8.
I hope so in principle.
No matter that patch was generated or suggested by a tool, you sent it and normal review procedure follows.
This is generally fine.
And here you ignored _all_ suggestions
I did not integrate a few of them for my commit message so far because it seems that there are open issues for further clarification.
Do you want that I send a second approach for this software module before your own evolving update suggestion?
and concentrate solely on improving Coccinelle scripts.
I hope not.
On kernel related lists suggestions to patch itself are discussed.
This is usual.
Whenever you take them into account while developing Coccinelle is up to you (on the Cocci list).
This is also happening, isn't it?
Regards, Markus