On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 9:07 AM, Paul Menzel paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Dear Alex,
Am Mittwoch, den 13.03.2013, 12:38 -0400 schrieb alexdeucher@gmail.com:
From: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com
Remove old comment and allow benchmarking moves within the same memory domain for both dma and blit methods.
Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher alexander.deucher@amd.com
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_benchmark.c | 5 +---- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_benchmark.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_benchmark.c index a2f0c24..6e05a2e 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_benchmark.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_benchmark.c @@ -122,10 +122,7 @@ static void radeon_benchmark_move(struct radeon_device *rdev, unsigned size, goto out_cleanup; }
/* r100 doesn't have dma engine so skip the test *//* also, VRAM-to-VRAM test doesn't make much sense for DMA *//* skip it as well if domains are the same */if ((rdev->asic->copy.dma) && (sdomain != ddomain)) {
if (rdev->asic->copy.dma) {why is the comment not valid anymore? What changed?
In my opinion it was never valid.
Alex