On 02/04/2019 14.21, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Peter,
Thank you for the patch.
On Mon, Apr 01, 2019 at 03:33:42PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
In case either the HPD gpio is not specified or when the HPD gpio can not be used as interrupt we should tell the core that the HPD needs to be polled for detecting hotplug.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi peter.ujfalusi@ti.com
drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c | 14 +++++++++++--- 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c index 285be4a0f4bd..6fc831eb3804 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/ti-tfp410.c @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ struct tfp410 {
struct i2c_adapter *ddc; struct gpio_desc *hpd;
- int hpd_irq; struct delayed_work hpd_work; struct gpio_desc *powerdown;
@@ -124,8 +125,10 @@ static int tfp410_attach(struct drm_bridge *bridge) return -ENODEV; }
- if (dvi->hpd)
- if (dvi->hpd_irq >= 0)
Do you need a new hpd_irq field ? Can't you just test dvi->hpd as done today, simply adding the else clause to this if ?
We can have hpd GPIO, but the GPIO might not be usable for interrupt.
dvi->connector.polled = DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_HPD;
else
dvi->connector.polled = DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_CONNECT | DRM_CONNECTOR_POLL_DISCONNECT;drm_connector_helper_add(&dvi->connector, &tfp410_con_helper_funcs);
@@ -324,10 +327,15 @@ static int tfp410_init(struct device *dev, bool i2c) return PTR_ERR(dvi->powerdown); }
- if (dvi->hpd) {
- if (dvi->hpd)
dvi->hpd_irq = gpiod_to_irq(dvi->hpd);- else
dvi->hpd_irq = -ENXIO;- if (dvi->hpd_irq >= 0) { INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&dvi->hpd_work, tfp410_hpd_work_func);
ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, gpiod_to_irq(dvi->hpd),
ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(dev, dvi->hpd_irq, NULL, tfp410_hpd_irq_thread, IRQF_TRIGGER_RISING | IRQF_TRIGGER_FALLING | IRQF_ONESHOT, "hdmi-hpd", dvi);
- Péter
Texas Instruments Finland Oy, Porkkalankatu 22, 00180 Helsinki. Y-tunnus/Business ID: 0615521-4. Kotipaikka/Domicile: Helsinki