On Thu, Oct 01, 2015 at 10:00:58AM +0300, Joonas Lahtinen wrote:
Avoid magic numbers and use the introduced defines.
Cc: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com Signed-off-by: Joonas Lahtinen joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com
drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c | 2 +- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c | 3 ++- drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_fb.c | 4 ++-- drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c | 2 +- 5 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c index 36fda86..d0299ae 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/atmel-hlcdc/atmel_hlcdc_plane.c @@ -633,7 +633,7 @@ static int atmel_hlcdc_plane_atomic_check(struct drm_plane *p, if (!state->bpp[i]) return -EINVAL;
switch (state->base.rotation & 0xf) {
switch (state->base.rotation & DRM_ROTATE_MASK) {diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c index e600a5f..e7c8422 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc.c @@ -5629,7 +5629,8 @@ unsigned int drm_rotation_simplify(unsigned int rotation, { if (rotation & ~supported_rotations) { rotation ^= BIT(DRM_REFLECT_X) | BIT(DRM_REFLECT_Y);
rotation = (rotation & ~0xf) | BIT((ffs(rotation & 0xf) + 1) % 4);
rotation = (rotation & DRM_REFLECT_MASK) |BIT((ffs(rotation & DRM_ROTATE_MASK) + 1) % 4);}
return rotation;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c index 631f5af..531ac4c 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_rect.c @@ -330,7 +330,7 @@ void drm_rect_rotate(struct drm_rect *r, } }
There's also a 'rotation & (BIT(DRM_REFLECT_X) | BIT(DRM_REFLECT_Y))' stuff in these functions that could be changed to use the new reflect mask instead.
But anyway, the patches look fine, so for both Reviewed-by: Ville Syrjälä ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com
PS. I wouldn't be opposed to a patch that kills the BIT() stuff all over (ie. changes the defines to be of the form 1<<n already). I think the only complication is drm_property_create_bitmask() which wants the bit number. So that would need changing to take them as masks already, which I think would make sense anyway.
- switch (rotation & 0xf) {
- switch (rotation & DRM_ROTATE_MASK) { case BIT(DRM_ROTATE_0): break; case BIT(DRM_ROTATE_90):
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ void drm_rect_rotate_inv(struct drm_rect *r, { struct drm_rect tmp;
- switch (rotation & 0xf) {
- switch (rotation & DRM_ROTATE_MASK) { case BIT(DRM_ROTATE_0): break; case BIT(DRM_ROTATE_90):
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_fb.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_fb.c index 51b1219..636a1f9 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_fb.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_fb.c @@ -171,7 +171,7 @@ void omap_framebuffer_update_scanout(struct drm_framebuffer *fb, uint32_t w = win->src_w; uint32_t h = win->src_h;
switch (win->rotation & 0xf) {
switch (win->rotation & DRM_ROTATE_MASK) {@@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ void omap_framebuffer_update_scanout(struct drm_framebuffer *fb, info->rotation_type = OMAP_DSS_ROT_TILER; info->screen_width = omap_gem_tiled_stride(plane->bo, orient); } else {
switch (win->rotation & 0xf) {
switch (win->rotation & DRM_ROTATE_MASK) {diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c index 09e363b..3054bda 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/omapdrm/omap_plane.c @@ -108,7 +108,7 @@ static void omap_plane_atomic_update(struct drm_plane *plane, win.src_x = state->src_x >> 16; win.src_y = state->src_y >> 16;
- switch (state->rotation & 0xf) {
- switch (state->rotation & DRM_ROTATE_MASK) { case BIT(DRM_ROTATE_90): case BIT(DRM_ROTATE_270): win.src_w = state->src_h >> 16;
-- 2.4.3